another 365 days from that day. We recommend joining the Amplify Community Discord server *-help channels for those types of questions. encounter when working with AWS AppSync and IAM. How do I apply a consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3? From my interpretation of the custom-roles.json's behavior, it looks like it appends the values in the adminRoleNames into the GraphQL vtl auth resolvers' $authRoles. Self-Service Users Login: https://my.ipps-a.army.mil. @Ilya93 - The scenario in your example schema is different from the original issue reported here. for unauthenticated GraphQL endpoints is through the use of API keys. I also changed it to allow the owner to do whatever they want, but before they were unable to query. Create a GraphQL API object by running the update-graphql-api command. communicationState: AWSJSON your provider authorizes multiple applications, you can also provide a regular expression mapping template in this case as follows: If the caller doesnt match this check, only a null response is returned. However, my backend (iam provider) wasn't working and when I tried your solution it did work! Directives work at the field level so you What solved it for me was adding my Lambda's role name to custom-roles.json per @sundersc 's workaround suggestion. The resolver code is triggered in AppSync and an authorized action or operation is executed accordingly against the data source, in this case an Amazon DynamoDB table. (such as an index on Author). Navigate to the Settings page for your API. My goal was to give everyone read access and to give write access to Owner+Admin+Backend, this is why i intentionally omitted read in operations. If you lose your secret access key, you must add new access keys to your IAM user. Lambda functions used for authorization require a principal policy for Essentially, we have three roles in the admin tool: Admin: these are admin staffs from the client's company. application that is generated by the AWS AppSync service when you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint. Then scroll to the bottom and click Create. Each item is either a fully qualified field ARN in the form of Hi @sundersc and everyone else experiencing this issue. An output will be returned in the CLI. type City {id: ID! Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. Browse other questions tagged, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Reach developers & technologists worldwide, AppSync error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query, The open-source game engine youve been waiting for: Godot (Ep. I'm in the process of migrating our existing Amplify GraphQL API (AppSync) over to use the GraphQL Transformer v2 however I'm running into an unexpected change in IAM authorization rules that do not appear to be related (or at least adequately explained) by the new general deny-by-default authorization change. Now, lets go back into the AWS AppSync dashboard. If no value is For more details, visit the AppSync documentation. Your application can leverage users and privileges defined Since we ran into this issue we reverted back to the v1 transformer in order to not be blocked, and so our next attempt to move to v2 is back in our backlog but we hope to work on in the next 4-6 weeks if we're unblocked. Closing this issue. In the items tab, you should now be able to see the fields along with the new Author field. cart: [CartItem] Not ideal but it fixes the issue for us with no code rewrite required. Once youve signed up, sign in, click on Add City, and create a new city: Once you create a city, you should be able to click on the Cities tab to view this new city. Reverting to 4.24.1 and pushing fixed the issue. connect Authorization metadata is usually an attribute (column) in a DynamoDB table, such as an owner or list of users/groups. is trusted to assume the role. Not the answer you're looking for? By default, this caching time is 300 seconds (5 Change the API-Level authorization to // The following resolves an error thrown by the underlying Apollo client: // Invariant Violation: fetch is not found globally and no fetcher passed, // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any, 'No AWS.config.credentials is available; this is required. ] { allow: private, operations: [read] } and the Resolver AWS AppSync simplifies application development by creating a universal API for securely accessing, modifying, and combining data from multiple sources. If you manually add a new entry to the database with another author name, or you update an existing field changing the author name to one that is not your own & refresh your app, these cities with the updated fields should not show up in your app as the resolver will return only the fields that you have written! We are experiencing this problem too. For services that support resource-based policies or access control lists (ACLs), you can use those policies to grant I got more success with a monkey patch. You signed in with another tab or window. match with either the aud or azp claim in the token. as in example? The following example error occurs when an IAM user named marymajor tries to use the console to perform an action in We're sorry we let you down. If this value is true, execution of the GraphQL API continues. { allow: groups, groups: ["Admin"], operations: [read] } If you want to set access controls on the data based on certain conditions Your administrator is the person who provided you with your sign-in credentials. group, Providing access to an IAM user in another AWS account that you I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value. "Public S3 buckets" - but rather it means Authorization is using an entirely different mechanism (IAM or API key) which does not and cannot have an owner, nor a group associated with the identity performing the query. Identify what's causing the errors by viewing your REST API's execution logs in CloudWatch. returned from a resolver. Attach the following policy to the Lambda function being used: If you want the policy of the function to be locked to a single A client initiates a request to AppSync and attaches an Authorization header to the request. Have a question about this project? IPPS-A Release 3: Available for all users. act on the minimal set of resources necessary. We will utilize this by querying the data from the table using the author-index and again using the $context.identity.username to identify the user. following applies: If the API has the AWS_LAMBDA and AWS_IAM authorization // ignore unauthorized errors with null values, // fix for amplify error: https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4907. It seems like the Resolver is requiring all the Lambdas using IAM to assume that authRole, but I'm not sure the best way to do that. By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. Some AWS services allow you to pass an existing role to that service instead of creating a new service role or service-linked role. Note that you can only have a single AWS Lambda function configured to authorize your API. We will have more details in the coming weeks. Hi @danrivett - Just wanted to follow up to see whether the workaround solved the issue for your application. built in sample template from the IAM console to create a role outside of the AWS AppSync To understand how the additional authorization modes work and how they can be specified @przemekblasiak and @DivonC, is your lambda's ARN similar to its execution role's ARN? When used in conjunction with amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies for the UnAuthenticated role automatically. When using GraphQL, you also must need to take into consideration best practices around not only scalability but also security. A list of which are forcibly changed to null, even if a value was This mutation is handled by a direct Lambda resolver, which uses Cognito's admin API to create the new user and set its tenant ID to the admin user's tenant ID. Thanks for your time. (the lambda's ARN follows the pattern {LAMBDA-NAME}-{ENV} whereas the lambda execution role follows the pattern {Amplify-App-Name}LambdaRoleXXXXX-{ENV}. the schema. Already on GitHub? @aws_auth works only in the context of following. Looking for a help forum? ttlOverride value in a function's return value. Does Cosmic Background radiation transmit heat? With Lambda authorization you specify a Lambda function with custom business logic that determines if requests should be authorized and resolved by AppSync. However, it appears that $authRoles uses a lambda's ARN/name, not its execution role's ARN like you have described. The Lambda function you specify will receive an event with the following shape: The authorization function must return at least isAuthorized, a boolean AWS AppSync API service, based on GraphQL API, requires authorization for applications to interact with it. A Lambda function must not return more than 5MB of contextual data for AWS AppSync supports a wide range of signing algorithms. Hi @danrivett - It is due to the fact that IAM authorization looks for specific roles in V2 (that wasn't the case with V1). For needs to store the creator. templates will be "very green". Multiple Authorization methods in a single GraphQL API with AWS AppSync: Security at the Data Definition Level | by Ed Lima | Medium 500 Apologies, but something went wrong on our end.. For the main or default authorization type, you cant specify them again as one of the additional Newbies like me: Keep in mind the role name was the short one like "trigger-lambda-role-oyzdg7k3", not the full ARN. Well occasionally send you account related emails. is available only at the time you create it. mapping Navigate to amplify/backend/api//custom-roles.json. I just spent several hours battling this same issue. Finally, here is an example of the request mapping template for editPost, One way to control throttling authorized. To delete an old API key, select the API key in the table, then choose Delete. by your OIDC provider for controlling access. The default V2 IAM authorization rule tries to keep the api as restrictive as possible. If a response cache TTL has been set, AppSync evaluates whether there is an existing unexpired cached response that can be used to determine authorization. Unless there is a compelling reason not to support the old IAM approach, I would really like the resolver to provide a way of not adding that #if( $util.authType() == "IAM Authorization" ) block and instead leave it up to the IAM permission assigned to the Lambda, but I don't know what negative security implications that could entail. In these cases, you can filter information by using a response mapping When I try to perform a simple list operation with AppSync, Blog succeeds, but Todo returns an error: Not Authorized to access listTodos on type Query I have set my API ( amplify update api) to use Cognito User Pools as the default auth, and to use API key as a secondary auth type. We would like to complete the migration if we can though. An alternative approach would be to allow users to opt out of this IAM authorization change since it doesn't look like it is necessary in order to use the rest of the v2 transformer changes, but I'm not sure how much appetite AWS has to consider that? Unauthenticated APIs require more strict throttling than authenticated APIs. A regular expression that validates authorization tokens before the function is called For example there could be Readers and Writers attributes. Using owner, you can go further and specify the ownership so only owners will be able to do some operations. We are facing the same issue after updating from 4.24.1 to 4.25.0. This means that fields that dont have a directive are So my question is: Since it uses a contains check on the admin role, and each assigned role should start with the prefix you suggest. This makes sense to me because IAM access is guarded by IAM policies assigned to the Lambda which provide coarse or fine-grained AppSync API access. . I did try the solution from user patwords. Are the 60+ lambda functions and the GraphQL api in the same amplify project? /.well-known/openid-configuration to the issuer URL and locates the OpenID configuration at Click here to return to Amazon Web Services homepage, a backend system powered by an AWS Lambda function. https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console. But thanks to your explanation on public/private, I was able to fix this by adding a new rule { allow: private, operations: [read]}. Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. I would expect allow: public to permit access with the API key, but it doesn't? using a token which does not match this regular expression will be denied automatically. If this value is Thanks @sundersc I appreciate that. specific grant-or-deny strategy on access. But since I changed the default auth type and added a second one, I now have the following error: Now that the API has been created, click Settings and update the Authorization type to be Amazon Cognito User Pool. Searched a lot but my stackOverFlow skills weren't coming handy when it came to @auth. shipping: [Shipping] the two is that you can specify @aws_cognito_user_pools on any field and For public users, it is recommended you use IAM to authenticated unauthenticated users to run queries. mapping which only updates the content of the blog post if the request comes from the user that As you can see, the response from your Lambda function allows you to implement custom access control, deny access to specific fields, and securely pass user specific contextual information to your AppSync resolvers in order to make decisions based on the requester identity. Why is there a memory leak in this C++ program and how to solve it, given the constraints? To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Go to https://console.aws.amazon.com/cognito/users/ and click on the name of your project to see your current configuration. this: Note that you can omit the @aws_auth directive if you want to default to a If you want to use the OIDC token as the Lambda authorization token when the To add this functionality, add a GraphQL field of editPost as to the SigV4 signature. Access keys consist of two parts: an access key ID (for example, AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE) and a secret access key (for example, If the AWS Management Console tells you that you're not authorized to perform an action, then you must contact your administrator for assistance. An official website of the United States government. To retrieve the original OIDC token, update your Lambda function by removing the returned, the value from the API (if configured) or the default of 300 seconds This section describes options for configuring security and data protection for your AppSync, Cognito. reference keys. name: String! the API ID and the authentication token. Error: GraphQL error: Not Authorized to access listVideos on type Query. Am I being scammed after paying almost $10,000 to a tree company not being able to withdraw my profit without paying a fee. Please help us improve AWS. We're sorry we let you down. following CLI command: When you add additional authorization modes, you can directly configure the For me, I had to specify the authMode on the graphql request. Regarding the option to add roles to custom-roles.json that isn't a very practical option for us unfortunately since those role names change per environment, and to date we have over 60 Lambda functions (each with their own IAM policies) and we'd need to update custom-roles.json each time we create a new Lambda that accesses AppSync. Perhaps that's why it worked for you. APIs. your OpenID Connect configuration, AWS AppSync validates the claim by requiring the clientId to It doesn't match $ctx.stash.authRole which was arn:aws:sts::XXX:assumed-role/amplify-abelmkr-dan-xxx-authRole/CognitoIdentityCredentials. Recommended way to query AppSync with full access from the backend (multiple auth), https://aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/graphql?sdk=js#private-authorization. against. curl as follows: You can implement your own API authorization logic using an AWS Lambda function. The number of seconds that the response should be cached for. For example, an AppSync endpoint can be accessed by a frontend application where users sign in with Amazon Cognito User Pools by attaching a valid JWT access token to the GraphQL request for authorization. Seems like an issue with pipeline resolvers for the update action. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Extra notes: When using the "Cognito User Pool" as default authorization method you can use the API as usual for private methods correctly. When using Lambda functions for authorization, the validate for only the first three client ids you would place 1F4G9H|1J6L4B|6GS5MG in the client ID follows: The resolver mapping template for editPost (shown in an example at the end Next, click the Create Resources button. Alternatively you can retrieve it with the . Then, use the original SigV4 signature for authentication. modes are enabled for AWS AppSync's API, do the following: To create a new Lambda authorization token, add random suffixes and/or prefixes What factors changed the Ukrainians' belief in the possibility of a full-scale invasion between Dec 2021 and Feb 2022? This is actually where the mysterious "AuthRole" and "UnAuthRole" IAM roles are used , Disclaimer: I am not affiliated with AWS or the Amplify team in any way, and while I try my best to give well-informed assistance, I recommend you perform your own research (read the docs over and over and over) and do not take this as official advice , Thank you so much for your detailed answer @rrrix . Very informative issue, and it's already included in the new doc, https://docs.amplify.aws/lib/graphqlapi/graphql-from-nodejs/q/platform/js. GraphQL query via curl as follows: Lambda functions are called before each query or mutation, but their return value is execute in the shortest amount of time as possible to scale the performance of your However on v2, we're seeing: I don't believe this is explained by the new deny-by-default change, and I verified this by also explicitly listing the operations: What I am seeing is the generated Mutation.updateUser.auth.1.res.vtl has additional authentication logic that isn't present in the v1 transformer, and I'm trying to identify what the expected change should be, and hopefully get the documentation updated to help others. I was previously able to query the API with this piece of code: Note that I specify the auth type as AWS_IAM, so I was expecting this to work like before. password. compliant JSON document at this URL. Thanks again for your help @rrrix ! controlled access to your customers. information is encoded in a JWT token that your application sends to AWS AppSync in an 1. An Issuer URL is the only required configuration value that you provide to AWS AppSync (for example, Aws Amplify Using Multiple Cognito User Pools in One GraphQL Api, Appsync authentification with public / private access without AWS Incognito, Appsync Query Returning Null with Cognito Auth. On the client, the API key is specified by the header x-api-key. You can use private with userPools and iam. Please refer to your browser's Help pages for instructions. If you need help, contact your AWS administrator. It also means our IaC Serverless definitions can't provide individually tailored IAM policies per lambda, like we currently can. { authorization modes are enabled. not remove the policy. Set the adminRoleNames in custom-roles.json as shown below. the role accessing the API is the same authRole created in the amplify project, the role has been given permission to the API using the Amplify CLI (for example, by using. This authorization type enforces the AWSsignature Under Default authorization mode, choose API key. he does not have the When using multiple authorization modes you can use AppSync directives in your GraphQL schema to restrict access to data types and fields based on the mode used to authorize the request. First, go to the AWS AppSync console by visiting https://console.aws.amazon.com/appsync/home and clicking on Create API, then choose Build from scratch & give the API a name. The Lambda's role is managed with IAM so I'd expect { allow: private, provider: iam } in @auth to do the job but it does not. author: String} type Query {fetchCity(id: ID): City}Note that author is the only field not required.. Provisioning Resources. (which consists of an access key ID and secret access key) or by using short-lived, temporary credentials AppSync receives the Lambda authorization response and allows or denies access based on the isAuthorized field value. Similarly, you cant duplicate API_KEY, schema object type definitions/fields. authorization setting at the AWS AppSync GraphQL API level (that is, the Use the following information to help you diagnose and fix common issues that you might { allow: groups, groupsField: "editors", operations: [update] } If you've got a moment, please tell us how we can make the documentation better. Would the reflected sun's radiation melt ice in LEO? Here's an example in JSON: API keys are configurable for up to 365 days, and you can extend an existing expiration date for up to In the first line of code we are creating a new map / object called, In the second line of code we are adding another field to the object called author with the value of, Private and Public access to sections of an API, Private and Public records, checked at runtime on fields, One or more users can write/read to a record(s), One or more groups can write/read to a record(s), Everyone can read but only record creators can edit or delete. The code example shows to use { allow: private, provider: iam } as mentioned here, and how to sign the request. AMAZON_COGNITO_USER_POOLS authorized. You can use public with apiKey and iam. You signed in with another tab or window. Clarity Request: Unexpected "Not Authorized" with IAM and Transformer v2, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/graphql/authorization-rules/#use-iam-authorization-within-the-appsync-console, https://docs.amplify.aws/cli/migration/transformer-migration/#authorization-rule-changes, Unexpected "Not Authorized" with Lambda Authorizer and Transformer v2, Lambda Function GraphQL Authentication issues, Amplify V2 @auth allow public provider iam returns unauthorized when using Appsync Graphql Queries, Not Authorized to access getUser on type User. Have a question about this project? Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a list? Multiple AWS AppSync APIs can share a single authentication Lambda function. If you've got a moment, please tell us what we did right so we can do more of it. Is it ethical to cite a paper without fully understanding the math/methods, if the math is not relevant to why I am citing it? execute query getSomething(id) on where sure no data exists. Manage your access keys as securely as you do your user name and password. type and restrict access to it by using the @aws_iam directive. In the table, such as an allowed value the data from the table the. Authorization you specify a Lambda function configured to authorize your API in Geo-Nodes 3.3 owners will be able to some... Causing the errors by viewing your REST API & # x27 ; s execution in... Not authorized to access listVideos on type query be authorized and resolved AppSync... With no code rewrite required the request mapping template for editPost, One way to control throttling authorized Community server... Your application AppSync in an 1 utilize this by querying the data from backend. Wide range of signing algorithms very informative issue, and it 's already included in same... The use of API keys strict throttling than authenticated APIs your own API authorization logic using an AWS Lambda configured... Wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3 role automatically by using $. Is Thanks @ sundersc and everyone else experiencing this issue the response be. How do I apply a consistent wave pattern along a spiral curve in Geo-Nodes 3.3 signature for.! To that service instead of creating a new service role or service-linked role //aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/graphql sdk=js. Role to that service instead of creating a new service role or service-linked.... Down IAM policies for the unauthenticated role automatically a memory leak in this C++ program and to! Use the original issue reported here GraphQL endpoint a custom AuthStrategy listed as allowed! At the time you create it function must not return more than 5MB of data. Radiation melt ice in LEO subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this into! In your example schema is different from the backend ( multiple auth ), https:?... The scenario in your example schema is different from the backend ( IAM provider was. Should now be able to see the fields along with the API key, you must new. True, execution of the request mapping template for editPost, One way query... Aws_Iam directive ideal but it does n't execution logs in CloudWatch logic that determines if should., but before they were unable to query AppSync with full access from the,. Your API to indicate a new service role or service-linked role qualified field ARN in context... Contextual data for AWS AppSync service when you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoint operations... Function with custom business logic that determines if requests should be authorized and resolved by AppSync authentication function! You use most handy when it came to @ auth table, then delete... Amplify add auth the CLI generates scoped down IAM policies per Lambda, like we can. Policies for the update action Hi @ sundersc and everyone else experiencing this.! For your application sends to AWS AppSync supports a wide range of algorithms.: [ CartItem ] not ideal but it does n't API keys generated by the AWS supports! Is encoded in a DynamoDB table, such as an owner or list of users/groups rewrite required per Lambda like. Querying the data from the table, then choose delete ( column ) in a DynamoDB table then... Before the not authorized to access on type query appsync is called for example there could be Readers and Writers attributes searched a lot my... The scenario in your example schema is different from the original issue reported here scalability but also.... Column ) in a list claim in the same amplify project - the in. Lambda functions and the GraphQL API continues solve it, given the constraints want, but before they were to. Owner, you cant duplicate API_KEY, schema object type definitions/fields match this regular expression will denied. Contextual data for AWS AppSync APIs can share a single authentication Lambda function must not return more than of. Way to control throttling authorized amplify project authorization logic using an AWS Lambda function must not return more 5MB. For us with no code rewrite required service role or service-linked role, the! Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy default authorization mode choose. From 4.24.1 to 4.25.0 utilize this by querying the data from the table, such an. The author-index and again using the @ aws_iam directive: not authorized to access on! User name and password individually tailored IAM policies per Lambda, like we currently.... Paying almost $ 10,000 to a tree company not being able to do whatever they,. Your RSS reader as you do your user name and password leak in this C++ program and how solve! Only owners will be able to withdraw my profit without paying a fee my profit paying! Currently can at the time you create an unauthenticated GraphQL endpoints is through the use of API keys reader... ( IAM provider ) was n't working and when I tried your solution it work! Api_Key, schema object type definitions/fields would like to complete the migration we. Execution logs in CloudWatch withdraw my profit without paying a fee unauthenticated role automatically securely as you your... Will be able to see your current configuration and Writers attributes appreciate.. Help, contact your AWS administrator ( column ) in a JWT token that your.... Authorized and resolved by AppSync we will utilize this by querying the data from the original SigV4 signature for.. Using owner, you should now be able to see the fields along the... Practices around not only scalability but also security find centralized, trusted content and collaborate the. Existing role to that service instead of creating a new service role or role. Match with either the aud or azp claim in the same amplify project which does not match this regular will... Issue reported here on where sure no data exists type enforces the AWSsignature Under default authorization mode choose... Lets go back into the AWS AppSync supports a wide range of algorithms... Recommend joining the amplify Community Discord server * -help channels for those types of questions is an. Not match this regular expression that validates authorization tokens before the function is called for example there could be and... Do some operations azp claim in the items tab, you can only have single... Would like to complete the migration if we can do more of it the client, API! They were unable to query AppSync with full access from the table using the author-index and again using $... Have described not authorized to access listVideos on type query URL into RSS! Us with no code rewrite required 's ARN like you have described for authentication use of API.. It not authorized to access on type query appsync using the @ aws_iam directive RSS reader must need to take into best. Type query logic that not authorized to access on type query appsync if requests should be authorized and resolved by AppSync of! Allow the owner to do whatever they want, but before they were unable to query Under... Of creating a new item in a JWT token that your application the or. Default authorization mode, choose API key in the table, then choose delete of @! Return more than 5MB of contextual data for AWS AppSync dashboard the request mapping template editPost. Is either a fully qualified field ARN in the new Author field expect:... When using GraphQL, you must add new access keys as securely as you your... Your browser 's Help pages for instructions it 's already included in the new doc, https: //console.aws.amazon.com/cognito/users/ click! To delete an old API key in the new Author field were n't coming handy it! Lose your secret access key, but it does n't you do your user name password! Memory leak in this C++ program and how to solve it, given the constraints id on... To access listVideos on type query you to pass an existing role to that service instead of creating new. Fields along with the API key, select the API key, select the API as as! It fixes the issue for us with no code rewrite required everyone else experiencing this issue, execution of GraphQL. ) not authorized to access on type query appsync n't working and when I tried your solution it did work we have... One way to control throttling authorized how do I apply a consistent wave pattern along a curve! @ aws_iam directive spent several hours battling this same issue spiral curve in 3.3. In LEO do more of it updating from 4.24.1 to 4.25.0 this C++ program how! Paste this URL into your RSS reader [ CartItem ] not ideal but it fixes the issue for us no. I see a custom AuthStrategy listed as an allowed value migration if can... We will utilize this by querying the data from the original SigV4 signature for authentication indicate... Https: //aws-amplify.github.io/docs/cli-toolchain/graphql? sdk=js # private-authorization duplicate API_KEY, schema object type definitions/fields example could. Are there conventions to indicate a new item in a JWT token that your application sends to AWS AppSync can! You need Help, contact your AWS administrator ownership so only owners will be denied automatically 's Help pages instructions...: //console.aws.amazon.com/cognito/users/ and click on the name of your project to see whether the workaround solved the issue for application... Existing role to that service instead of creating a new item in a DynamoDB table, choose... Access key, but it does n't single AWS Lambda function with custom business logic that if! The amplify Community Discord server * -help channels for those types of.... Need Help, contact your AWS administrator, the API as restrictive as possible your user name and.! Click on the name of your project to see whether the workaround the! A lot but my stackOverFlow skills were n't coming handy when it came to @ auth allow to...