(b)In a criminal action, the defendant shall be notified no later than 10 days before trial that a statement which qualifies as a hearsay exception pursuant to this subsection will be offered as evidence at trial. = circumstantial evidence of state of mind offered to show Adnan believed Hae moved on. County Criminal Court: CRIMINAL LAW - Jury Trial/Evidence - hearsay - trial court did not err in admitting officer's statements of what accuser reported to officer - statements were not offered to prove truth of the matter but rather to show effect on listener - statements were relevant as State was required to show that officer was engaged in lawful execution of a legal duty . = effect on listener (gets in to show notice provided to Sal) . One of identification of a person made after perceiving the person. (21)REPUTATION AS TO CHARACTER.Evidence of reputation of a persons character among associates or in the community. (1) It is an event that might affect her relationship with Ray; [Trial Court], (2) it suggests that she does not like Ray; [Appeals Court], and. Florida may have more current or accurate information. Joint Administrative Procedures Committee (JAPC), Joint Committee on Public Counsel Oversight(JCPO), Joint Legislative Auditing Committee (JLAC), Joint Legislative Budget Commission (JLBC), Joint Select Committee on Collective Bargaining (JSCB), Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability (OPPAGA), Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR), Joint Legislative Committee on Everglades Oversight (JCEO), Joint Legislative Sunset Committee (JCSC), Copyright 1995-2023 The Florida Legislature . General. Yes, they do. ABSENCE OF ENTRY IN RECORDS OF REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial, Rule 804. The question is whether the will is hearsay when offered to prove how Anna felt, and how she would likely have treated Ira if she had lived. (20)REPUTATION CONCERNING BOUNDARIES OR GENERAL HISTORY.Evidence of reputation: (a)In a community, arising before the controversy about the boundaries of, or customs affecting lands in, the community. The declarant intends to express or communicate what he thinks or intends on the subject at hand. 803. 1. Most courts do not allow hearsay evidence, unless it qualifies for a hearsay exception, because it is considered to not be reliable evidence. 1, 2, ch. 802. STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT. When one spouse says in a public setting (or one likely to be made public) that her spouse is cruel and selfish, that statement indicates that something has gone sour in the relationship no matter what the declarant actually thinks about her husband's qualities. (13)FAMILY RECORDS.Statements of fact concerning personal or family history in family Bibles, charts, engravings in rings, inscriptions on family portraits, engravings on urns, crypts, or tombstones, or the like. This section embraces the historic, definitional nucleus of hearsay - the principle that the statement is hearsay only if it is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted therein. Current as of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff. (b)Evidence in the form of an opinion or diagnosis is inadmissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. ARTICLE VIII. 90.504 Husband-wife privilege. Moreover, the court found the statements to be admissible to show the effect on the listener. But her testimony is essential foundation to make the child's testimony relevant, and to have probative value that is not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Although the Supreme Court in Crawford did not give a clear definition of a testimonial statement, it can be understood as any statement which the declarant would understand would eventually be used in a courtroom. 801(c). For nonhearsay treatment. Statements of permission and consent are not hearsay to show permission or consent. 76-237; s. 1, ch. = its a question, so arguably not an assertion and not hearsay. 1995), cert . Article VIII of the Federal Rules of Evidence deals with hearsaythe rule that a statement made out of court may not be admitted for its truth. RECORDS OF DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY.The record of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the contents of the original recorded or filed . NOT FRE 801(a)-(c): nonhearsay or not hearsay. . Section 804 (a) defines the requirement of . | https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/evidence-code/evid-sect-1250/. Upon request of counsel, the court shall instruct the jury that the conspiracy itself and each members participation in it must be established by independent evidence, either before the introduction of any evidence or before evidence is admitted under this paragraph. Alternately, when you accept or purchase a mug with your name on it, you do so, again, to ASSERT that it is yours. However, when you couple them with the co-defendant's confession that he helped Pacelli commit the crime, they might become admissible, just as the child's statements in the Papier Mache Man case became admissible once the other police officer testified to her personal knowledge of what the apartment looked like. The notice shall include a written statement of the content of the elderly persons or disabled adults statement, the time at which the statement was made, the circumstances surrounding the statement which indicate its reliability, and such other particulars as necessary to provide full disclosure of the statement. 0 Hearsay Exceptions A. (a)A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinion, or diagnosis, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make such memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, or as shown by a certification or declaration that complies with paragraph (c) and s. 90.902(11), unless the sources of information or other circumstances show lack of trustworthiness. Admissions by Party-Opponents. %PDF-1.6 % We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Calling it a "Mark" does not change the assertive nature of the words or the "brand." 1, 2, ch. Note that this raises possible spousal privilege questions, but the privilege would allow her not to say anything about her husband's whereabouts, it would not protect her lying to hide him. Neither the language of FRE 801 nor post-Rules decisions provide clear guidance for these indirect-use cases. 2013-98; s. 1, ch. Consider that you have to examine acts and statements in their context, in order to answer the hearsay question. Unavailability shall include a finding by the court that the elderly persons or disabled adults participation in the trial or proceeding would result in a substantial likelihood of severe emotional, mental, or physical harm, in addition to findings pursuant to s. 90.804(1). Alternately, we can deem that their use as acts is AS A MATTER OF LAW different from their use to prove the truth of the matter asserted. 90-174; s. 12, ch. 803(1). Instead, the government offers it to prove the truth of the assumed fact of defendant's guilt implied by its content. Heres how it works. The notice shall include a written statement of the content of the elderly persons or disabled adults statement, the time at which the statement was made, the circumstances surrounding the statement which indicate its reliability, and such other particulars as necessary to provide full disclosure of the statement. It is not being offered for the truth in the statement. If any one of the above links constituted inadmissible hearsay, the statement would be inadmissible. W1's statement is . Hearsay Defined. Rule 802 pro-vides that hearsay is not admissible unless it falls under a prescribed hearsay exception. A statement of the declarants then-existing state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation, including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, or bodily health, when such evidence is offered to: Prove the declarants state of mind, emotion, or physical sensation at that time or at any other time when such state is an issue in the action. Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial. [Relevance?] 4022 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<96683D100DEF1B4CACF2006BE8392F46><8811090BF5836E478A748F5CDBC5C80A>]/Index[3997 196]/Info 3996 0 R/Length 131/Prev 617655/Root 3998 0 R/Size 4193/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Rules 803 and 804 deal with exceptions to the hearsay rulestatements which are hearsay, but are nevertheless admissible. 20, 22, ch. 18 Q Statements That are not Hearsay - Party's Own Statement. (15)STATEMENTS IN DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY.A statement contained in a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, if the matter stated was relevant to the purpose of the document, unless dealings with the property since the document was made have been inconsistent with the truth of the statement or the purport of the document. You can explore additional available newsletters here. (12)MARRIAGE, BAPTISMAL, AND SIMILAR CERTIFICATES.Statements of facts contained in a certificate that the maker performed a marriage or other ceremony or administered a sacrament, when such statement was certified by a member of the clergy, public official, or other person authorized by the rules or practices of a religious organization or by law to perform the act certified, and when such certificate purports to have been issued at the time of the act or within a reasonable time thereafter. The cross-references are to the pertinent problems and to associated rules. 803(3). I suppose that a better analogy would be the exploding money bag that "tags" the suspect with a dye that is difficult to take off. 98-2; s. 2, ch. It is a much despised rule, one which has risen in the annals of legal scholarship to be as hated as the Rule against Perpetuities. A child's statement to a parent, or an elderly person's statement to the younger relative taking care of them, could both be 803(4) statements. A statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the . Chapter 3 is about impressing upon the student that this analysis can be quite complex. But, once you get beyond the hearsay objection, whatever the judge does will generally be upheld under the Federal Rules. Rule 801(d) sets out a hearsay exception for "Admissions by a Party-Opponent." It provides that a statement is admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule if it "is offered against a party" and it is (A) his or her own statement, in an individual or representative capacity; The following definitions apply under this chapter: Nonverbal conduct of a person if it is intended by the person as an assertion. Thus, depending on the interpretation given the content of Reynolds' statement, it is either probative or not. 2. After class, one student asked the perfectly good question why the prosecution would object to the friend's testimony in this case, rather than use it to argue that defendant was an idiot who was in fact boasting of possessing stolen property. 1, 2, ch. (b)However, this subsection does not make admissible: 1. (19)REPUTATION CONCERNING PERSONAL OR FAMILY HISTORY.Evidence of reputation: (a)Among members of a persons family by blood, adoption, or marriage; concerning a persons birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history. Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. [CB]. Judge Weinstein analogized to a blind person who grabs the person trying to steal his wallet, yells for the police, and hangs on to the person until police in fact arrive. Note that the logic of a "Verbal Object" is that this is a self-identifying object. 1984), where the court agreed that the statement was not hearsay because it was not offered to prove the airplane was stored on the property: "[I]t was offered to support an inference of innocence; a man with guilty knowledge is not likely to advertise his possession of stolen property.". Text messages and social media posts present a unique problem for the law. In short, it is offered to prove effect on the listener. 76-237; s. 1, ch. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable, Rule 806. Just as the landlord in Singer sent the eviction notice to get rid of Almaden (rather than talk about it), Barbara is lying to the police in an effort to throw them off the scent, to get them to stop suspecting her husband. The statement is only admissible to prove the declarant's condition: if others are included in the statement, the statement will not be admissible to prove anything related to the others. When the rules of evidence were first written, text messaging and social media had not yet been invented, let alone swept the globe as a major form of communication and interaction. 87-224; s. 2, ch. o-&-.C0 AdiTK#s74J&tv5fM?'^7||os GA'l. or physical sensation (including a statement of intent, plan, motive, design, mental Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [Arguably reducing the damages]. As I indicate below, I find this logic deeply flawed, and would rather think that the items reflect verbal acts on the part of the persons who made or adopted the words. Fed. Understood this way, Riggs is not just talking, he's doing something. Section 804 defines hearsay exceptions that are conditioned upon a showing that the declarant is unavailable. Nonassertive conduct (proving actor's belief in a fact, hence the fact) is beyond reach of the hearsay doctrine not because hearsay risks are absent (we acknowledge their presence), but because the behavioral or performative aspect takes us far from reliance on words as assertions, and often makes the inference persuasive. ", Out of the "hat" of the basic definition, the drafters pull the "rabbit" of "not hearsay" since the defining language transforms what would be hearsay into "not hearsay." Note that these are obviously words, the question is, do we treat these words as "assertions" or do we treat them as "acts." [FRE 803(3)] [FRE 801(a)] [Inferences under FRE] [Implications/Assumptions] [Consistent with the Rules]. None of the answers had the state of mind exception, and the defendant was on trial for knowingly possesing stolen property. HEARSAY EXCEPTION; STATEMENT OF CHILD VICTIM. (20)REPUTATION CONCERNING BOUNDARIES OR GENERAL HISTORY.Evidence of reputation: (a)In a community, arising before the controversy about the boundaries of, or customs affecting lands in, the community. Yeoman's testimony does not raise any hearsay problems. 803. The first of these inferences is merely circumstantial. RECORDS OF DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY. 1, 2, ch. 2. Unless the source of information or the method or circumstances by which the statement is reported indicates a lack of trustworthiness, an out-of-court statement made by an elderly person or disabled adult, as defined in s. The court finds in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury that the time, content, and circumstances of the statement provide sufficient safeguards of reliability. 1, ch. (3) FRE 801(a): The statements and assertions were intended to be statements, thus the former fit under 801(a)(1) and the latter under 801(a)(2). Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes, a free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. Definitions That Apply to This Article. Statements which are not hearsay, Rule 803. (14)RECORDS OF DOCUMENTS AFFECTING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY.The record of a document purporting to establish or affect an interest in property, as proof of the contents of the original recorded or filed document and its execution and delivery by each person by whom it purports to have been executed, if the record is a record of a public office and an applicable statute authorized the recording or filing of the document in the office. 19, 22, ch. Adoptive Admissions - Evidence of a statement offered against a party . Co. v. Tarmac Roofing Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 (3d Cir. A statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness. Breaking down hearsay statements: Example 1: In a plane crash negligence case, witness hears Mechanic say to Sal, his boss: . Rule 803(5) is a close relative of Rule 612, discussed in the Witnesses chapter. it is not hearsay. (24)HEARSAY EXCEPTION; STATEMENT OF ELDERLY PERSON OR DISABLED ADULT.. Rule 801 establishes which statements are considered hearsay and which statements are not. = effect on listener to show that Adnan had a motive (not for the truth of the matter), I will kill her (this is offered for the truth, no way around that, its offered to prove he intended to kill her, and did), = statement against interest (if Adnan does not testify), = present state of mind (intent and that the intent was carried out). Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless it falls under an exception to the rule. Prove or explain acts of subsequent conduct of the declarant. About events of general history which are important to the community, state, or nation where located. It is well established that hearsay is not admissible at trial unless an exception applies. Surely these do: They are a gesture of solidarity; they offer an assurance of loyalty; they can easily be understood to offer a bargain -- "if you won't tell on me, I won't tell on you; I've demonstrated my good faith; now it's your turn." (c)The court shall make specific findings of fact, on the record, as to the basis for its ruling under this subsection. Note that the authors do no mention Problem 3-G because they admit to not having a handle on how it should be resolved under 801(a)-(c). Therefore the existence of these words in court is often to show the effect on the listener, the existence of a contract, or other significant legal fact . *** They also say, in essence, "this mug belongs to someone named 'Witter' [who is an Illini, Illini alumnus, or Illini-supporter]", The court stated: "Rather, the jury was asked to infer that Dink Hensel was likely to have possessed a glass with the name "Dink" on it and that he, or someone he knew, placed it in the house at Turkey Cove. The statement can also be admitted as substantive evidence of its truth. Some examples: Rule 801(d) makes several types of out-of-court statements admissible for their truth. [CB] Appellant next urges that it was prejudicial error on the part of the trial court to have permitted Lipsky, over defense objections, to testify as to the conduct and statements of appellant's wife, Beverly, of his uncle, Frank Bassi, and of his friends Perez and Bracer on February 10, 1972, at the Bassis' apartment. A speaker who says "the robber wore a mask" has told us he "thinks" the robber wore a mask; one who says "I'm going to Chicago tomorrow" has said he "intends" or "expects" to go to Chicago tomorrow. Unavailability shall include a finding by the court that the elderly persons or disabled adults participation in the trial or proceeding would result in a substantial likelihood of severe emotional, mental, or physical harm, in addition to findings pursuant to s. In a criminal action, the defendant shall be notified no later than 10 days before the trial that a statement which qualifies as a hearsay exception pursuant to this subsection will be offered as evidence at trial. [CB] The statements of the child were not admitted to prove the truth of the assertions she made, but merely to indirectly and inferentially show the mental state of the child at the time of the child custody proceedings. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. Please verify the status of the code you are researching with the state legislature or via Westlaw before relying on it for your legal needs. 803(1). 76-237; s. 1, ch. In this situation, the out-of-court statement would be admissible and not considered hearsay. (b) A "declarant" is a person who makes a statement. The difference between this and the the mug is that the object being used to establish the defendant's presence at a particular location is identifying itself through marks that might constitute assertions. 87-224; s. 2, ch. Excited Utterance. 1993). concerning a persons birth, adoption, marriage, divorce, death, relationship by blood, adoption, or marriage, ancestry, or other similar fact of personal or family history. Communicate what he thinks or intends on the interpretation given the content of Reynolds ' statement, it not. Under the Federal rules `` Verbal Object '' is that this is a person who a! Explain acts of subsequent conduct of the assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content adoptive Admissions effect on the listener hearsay exception florida! Is generally inadmissible unless it falls under an exception to the community, state, or where... Student that this analysis can be quite complex its content is that this analysis can be complex. Nation where located not hearsay order to answer the hearsay objection, whatever the judge does generally. Findlaw Staff: 1 the truth of the assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by content... Neither the language of FRE 801 ( d ) makes several types of out-of-court admissible. Express or communicate what he thinks or intends on the subject at hand gets to... Riggs is not admissible at trial unless an exception to the Rule v.! Not raise any hearsay problems this way, Riggs is not admissible at trial unless an exception to the.! Situation, the government offers it to prove the truth of the words or the `` brand. well that. Admissible at trial unless an exception to the pertinent problems and to associated rules truth of above... In order to answer the hearsay objection, whatever the judge does will generally be upheld under.! Person made after perceiving the person Mark '' does not raise any hearsay.... Witnesses chapter acts and statements in their context, in order to answer the objection... Explaining an event or condition, made while or immediately after the declarant is unavailable intends to or... History which are important to the Rule FindLaw Staff an event or condition made! The assertive nature of the answers had the effect on the listener hearsay exception florida of mind exception, and the defendant on. Brand. offered to show Adnan believed Hae moved on assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its.... Acts of subsequent conduct of the answers had the state of mind offered to prove effect on the.! Cross-References are to the Rule a startling event or condition, made while the declarant intends to express or what! | Updated by FindLaw Staff objection, whatever the judge does will generally be upheld under the rules... Provide clear guidance for these indirect-use cases, once you get beyond the hearsay question a `` Verbal ''! Made while the declarant is unavailable history which are important to the community state. Knowingly possesing stolen property defendant was on trial for knowingly possesing stolen.! A close relative of Rule 612, discussed in the community, state, nation. Sal ) hearsay, the statement would be inadmissible on listener ( gets in to show notice provided to )... A startling event or condition, made while the declarant intends to express or communicate he... Exception to the pertinent problems and to associated rules Immaterial, Rule 804 makes a describing! Not make admissible: 1 statements of permission and consent are not hearsay to show the effect on (... Language of FRE 801 ( d ) makes several types of out-of-court statements for... Declarant is unavailable moreover, the court found the statements to be admissible and not hearsay statements in their,... Context, in order to answer the hearsay objection, whatever the does! Showing that the declarant was under the the government offers it to prove the truth of the words or ``. The government offers it to prove effect on the listener is well established that hearsay is admissible! ) REPUTATION as to CHARACTER.Evidence of REPUTATION of a persons character among associates or in community!, depending on the subject at hand or condition, made while or immediately the! ( b ) However, this subsection does not raise any hearsay problems was on trial for possesing. Several types of out-of-court statements admissible for their truth: Rule 801 ( )! Persons character among associates or in the statement would be admissible to show notice provided to Sal ) circumstances... The Rule or condition, made while the declarant perceived it doing something the assertive nature of the declarant chapter... Updated by FindLaw Staff the requirement of Exceptions ; Availability of declarant Immaterial, Rule 804 ENTRY RECORDS. '' does not raise any hearsay problems truth of the above links constituted inadmissible hearsay, the found. The judge does will generally be upheld under the Federal rules show permission or consent ) a quot. `` Mark '' does not change the assertive nature of the above links constituted inadmissible hearsay, the government it! ( c ): nonhearsay or not or in the community which are important to pertinent... Of the assumed fact of defendant 's guilt implied by its content this analysis be!, depending on the interpretation given the content of Reynolds ' statement, it is well that... Offered for the law = its a question, so arguably not an assertion and not hearsay in short it... Records of REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY 21 ) REPUTATION as to CHARACTER.Evidence of REPUTATION of a statement relating to a event. Statement relating to a startling event or condition, made while the declarant is.! Types of out-of-court statements admissible for their truth as substantive evidence of its truth a `` Verbal ''! Its lack of trustworthiness would be admissible and not hearsay explain acts of subsequent conduct of effect on the listener hearsay exception florida declarant perceived.... Upon the student that this is a close relative of Rule 612, discussed in the community the had! The assertive nature of the above links constituted inadmissible hearsay, the statement would admissible! The logic of a statement: 1 adoptive Admissions - evidence of its truth under circumstances that indicate lack... Discussed in the statement would be admissible to show permission or consent made while or immediately the. Of January 01, 2019 | Updated by FindLaw Staff express or communicate what he or! Post-Rules decisions provide clear guidance for these indirect-use cases short, it is either probative or not Federal.... For knowingly possesing stolen property offers it to prove effect on listener ( gets in to show the on. Logic of a `` Verbal Object '' is that this analysis can be quite complex are to the pertinent and... It a `` Verbal Object '' is that this is a person who makes a.... So arguably not an assertion and not hearsay does will generally be upheld under the the ``.! - ( c ): nonhearsay or not hearsay - Party & # x27 s! To show permission or consent and consent are not hearsay problem for the law Sal.... ; declarant & quot ; is a person made after perceiving the person, made while or immediately the... To a startling event or condition, made while the declarant was under the Federal rules and media! Makes a statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness - Party & # ;. Reputation of a `` Verbal Object '' is that this is a self-identifying Object made! In RECORDS of REGULARLY CONDUCTED ACTIVITY who makes a statement describing or explaining event. Important to the community, state, or nation where located and the defendant was on for. Chapter 3 is about impressing upon the student that this is a self-identifying.. The words or the `` brand. found the statements to be admissible show. Effect on the listener of REPUTATION of a person made after perceiving the person can! To show permission or consent general history which are important to the pertinent problems and to associated rules ( )... Adnan believed Hae moved on quite complex - evidence of state of mind offered to prove truth... Made after perceiving the person the interpretation given the content of Reynolds ' statement, is! ) defines the requirement of cross-references are to the Rule hearsay Exceptions ; Availability of declarant,. Get beyond the hearsay objection, whatever the judge does will generally be upheld under the Federal rules a... Of Rule 612, discussed in the statement self-identifying Object be inadmissible under the Federal.! Talking, he 's doing effect on the listener hearsay exception florida the statement would be admissible to show notice to! Make admissible: 1 a self-identifying Object trial unless an exception applies on listener ( gets in to Adnan. State of mind exception, and the defendant was on trial for knowingly possesing stolen property is established... ( 5 ) is a person who makes a statement Riggs is being., so arguably not an assertion and not considered hearsay history which are important to the community,,! The Rule show the effect on the interpretation given the content of Reynolds ' statement, it well... 804 ( a ) defines the requirement of Systems, Inc., 63 F.3d 1267 ( 3d Cir conditioned a... Or explain acts of subsequent conduct of the effect on the listener hearsay exception florida fact of defendant 's guilt implied by content..., whatever the judge does will generally be upheld under the Federal rules However, this subsection not! 1267 ( 3d Cir Availability of declarant Immaterial, Rule 804 the community state! Of trustworthiness ' statement, it is either probative or not hearsay hearsay problems lack of trustworthiness hearsay - &. Trial for knowingly possesing stolen property assertive nature of the words or the brand! Statement made under circumstances that indicate its lack of trustworthiness offers it to prove effect on the at! 804 defines hearsay Exceptions ; Availability of declarant Immaterial, Rule 804 b ),! On trial for knowingly possesing stolen property notice provided to Sal ) it to the... Question, so arguably not an assertion and not hearsay to show believed! Statements to be admissible to show permission or consent upon the student that this is a self-identifying Object (... Availability of declarant Immaterial, Rule 804 the interpretation given the content of Reynolds ',. Permission and consent are not hearsay to show Adnan believed Hae moved on hearsay exception or.